RADX Risk Assessment Calculator
Investment Risk Assessment
Current Market Metrics
Risk Assessment Results
WARNING: Based on article data:
- High 24h Trading Volume: $50,878 (< 1% of top coins)
- Critical Liquidity Risk: Only $50k daily volume
- High RSI: 12.16 (Extremely oversold)
Estimated Loss Potential
With $0 investment and current volume: 87% chance of significant loss.
You could lose $0 of your investment if market liquidity dries up.
When you hear "Radx AI" and "RADX" in the same sentence, it sounds like the next big thing in crypto - artificial intelligence meets blockchain, right? But here’s the truth: Radx AI isn’t a breakthrough project. It’s a low-volume, low-attention token with almost no real-world use, no developer activity, and a price that’s barely holding on. If you’re thinking about buying it, you need to know what you’re really getting into.
What Radx AI (RADX) Actually Is
Radx AI ($RADX) is a cryptocurrency token launched in late 2024, listed on exchanges like HTX and LBank. It claims to be building a decentralized platform for AI applications - but that’s where the story ends. There’s no whitepaper. No GitHub repo. No team members listed. No roadmap. No updates since its listing.
Unlike real AI crypto projects like Fetch.ai or SingularityNET, which have working AI agents, developer communities, and real API integrations, Radx AI has nothing tangible. It’s a token with a buzzword name and zero substance. It doesn’t run on its own blockchain. It’s not even clear which network it’s built on - Ethereum? BSC? Something else? The lack of basic technical details makes it impossible to verify claims or assess security.
The Price of Radx AI - And Why It’s Falling
As of November 1, 2025, Radx AI trades around $0.0519. That might sound cheap, but price doesn’t equal value. In fact, it’s down over 15% from its peak in October 2024. Here’s what the numbers show:
- 24-hour trading volume: $50,878 - that’s less than what a single tweet from a big crypto influencer can move in a popular coin.
- 50-day moving average: $0.0535 - price is below it, meaning the short-term trend is down.
- 200-day moving average: $0.0570 - long-term trend is also down.
- RSI (14-day): 12.16 - this is in the "extremely oversold" zone, but there’s been no bounce. That’s a red flag.
- Green days in the last 30: only 6 - meaning 80% of the time, the price drops.
Even worse, the Fear & Greed Index says "Greed" (74), but the market is acting like it’s terrified. That disconnect means people are buying based on hype, not fundamentals - a classic pump-and-dump setup.
Contradictory Price Predictions - Who Should You Believe?
Here’s where things get weird. Different sites give wildly different forecasts:
- CoinCodex predicts RADX will stay between $0.0513 and $0.0519 in 2025 - basically flatlining.
- LBank predicts it’ll crash to $0.000002 by 2026 - a 99.996% drop.
One says "hold steady," the other says "it’s going to zero." Which one’s right? Neither. They’re both guessing. And here’s why: Radx AI has no data to base predictions on. No usage. No revenue. No adoption. Just a price chart and a name.
Compare that to Fetch.ai (FET), which processes over a million AI queries daily, or SingularityNET (AGIX), which has 15,000+ active developers. Those projects have metrics. Radx AI has silence.
No Community. No Developers. No Future
Real crypto projects have communities. Reddit threads. Discord servers. Twitter discussions. GitHub commits. Radx AI has none of that.
Search for "Radx AI" on Reddit. Nothing. Twitter? A few bot accounts pushing buy signals. Telegram? No active groups. GitHub? No repository. No code. No updates since October 2024.
That’s not a project in development. That’s a token that got listed and forgot to build anything. Without developers, there’s no upgrade. Without users, there’s no demand. Without community, there’s no reason for anyone to care.
Liquidity Risk - You Might Not Be Able to Sell
With only $50,000 traded in 24 hours, Radx AI is dangerously illiquid. If you buy $1,000 worth, you might not be able to sell it without crashing the price. Large buyers could sweep the order book. You’d be stuck holding a token with no buyers.
CryptoRisk Analytics says tokens with trading volume under $100,000 and RSI below 15 have an 87% chance of being delisted within 18 months. Radx AI meets both conditions. That means exchanges could pull it at any time - and when that happens, your investment becomes worthless.
Why Radx AI Isn’t Like Other AI Coins
There are legitimate AI crypto projects out there:
- Fetch.ai (FET): Uses AI agents to automate tasks like booking travel or managing supply chains.
- SingularityNET (AGIX): Lets developers rent AI models on a decentralized marketplace.
- Ocean Protocol (OCEAN): Enables secure sharing of AI training data.
These projects have real products. Real users. Real revenue. Radx AI has a name and a chart. That’s it.
Buying Radx AI isn’t investing in AI. It’s gambling on a name that sounds futuristic. And history shows that name-only tokens rarely survive.
Should You Buy Radx AI?
No.
Not because it’s illegal. Not because it’s a scam (though it’s dangerously close). But because it offers zero value. No utility. No team. No future. Just volatility and risk.
If you’re looking to invest in AI crypto, focus on projects with:
- Public code repositories
- Active developer communities
- Real-world use cases
- Trading volume over $1 million daily
- Transparent teams
Radx AI has none of these. It’s a ghost token - listed, traded, but completely empty.
There are hundreds of crypto projects with real potential. Don’t waste your money on one that doesn’t even have a roadmap - let alone a product.
Is Radx AI (RADX) a scam?
It’s not officially labeled a scam, but it has all the red flags: no team, no code, no roadmap, no community, and extremely low trading volume. It’s more accurately described as a speculative token with no foundation. Many experts classify projects like this as "dead on arrival" - listed for hype, not utility.
Can I stake Radx AI (RADX)?
There is no official staking, yield, or reward program for Radx AI. No documentation exists about how to stake it, where to stake it, or what rewards you’d get. Any site claiming to offer RADX staking is likely a phishing page or a rug pull waiting to happen.
Where can I buy Radx AI (RADX)?
You can buy Radx AI on a few smaller exchanges like HTX and LBank. It’s not listed on major platforms like Binance, Coinbase, or Kraken. Be aware that buying on these smaller exchanges increases your risk - they have weaker security, less liquidity, and may delist the token without warning.
What’s the best wallet for Radx AI?
Since Radx AI’s blockchain isn’t disclosed, you can’t be sure which wallet is compatible. Most tokens like this are ERC-20 or BEP-20, so wallets like MetaMask or Trust Wallet might work - but there’s no guarantee. Always test with a tiny amount first. Never send large sums to an unverified token.
Will Radx AI go to zero?
It’s possible - and likely. With no development, no users, and trading volume under $100,000, Radx AI meets the criteria for high delisting risk. Many tokens like this disappear from exchanges within a year. If it’s delisted, your ability to sell disappears too. The $0.000002 prediction from LBank isn’t unrealistic - it’s just one possible outcome.
Is Radx AI a good investment for 2025?
No. There’s no evidence Radx AI will grow in value. The price has been flat or falling since launch. The market shows no interest. The project shows no progress. Any prediction of growth is pure speculation. If you’re looking for returns, there are dozens of AI crypto projects with real traction that are far safer bets.
What to Do Instead
If you believe in AI + blockchain, don’t chase low-volume tokens like Radx AI. Look at:
- Fetch.ai (FET) - real AI agents, live use cases.
- SingularityNET (AGIX) - marketplace for AI models, growing developer base.
- Ocean Protocol (OCEAN) - data sharing for AI training, used by enterprises.
These projects have transparency, activity, and measurable results. Radx AI has none of that. Don’t confuse noise with opportunity. The market rewards real work - not buzzwords.
Malinda Black
November 2, 2025 AT 04:46Just saw this and had to say thanks for laying it all out so clearly. I’ve been eyeing Radx AI out of curiosity, but after reading this, I’m glad I didn’t jump in. The lack of a GitHub repo alone should be a red flag for anyone serious about crypto.
Jeremy Jaramillo
November 3, 2025 AT 20:31This is exactly the kind of breakdown new investors need. Too many people get sucked in by names that sound techy without checking the fundamentals. Radx AI is a textbook example of a token with zero substance. Don’t confuse hype with innovation.
Sammy Krigs
November 4, 2025 AT 15:34wait so u r saying there no code?? like at all?? not even a single commit?? that sounds sus af. i thought all coins had at least a repo on github. this feels like a bot farm with a name slapped on it
naveen kumar
November 5, 2025 AT 06:10You’re all missing the bigger picture. Radx AI is being suppressed by the traditional finance elite because it’s too disruptive. The lack of a whitepaper? That’s intentional. They don’t want you to understand how the AI agents are really working - because they’re using quantum neural nets that can’t be disclosed yet. The low volume? That’s because the whales are accumulating quietly. The RSI is oversold because the market is being manipulated by centralized exchanges to scare off retail. This is the next big thing - and you’re all too blind to see it.
Bruce Bynum
November 6, 2025 AT 14:45Don’t gamble. Don’t chase hype. Look for real work. Radx AI? Skip it. FET, AGIX, OCEAN? Those are the ones putting in the hours. Simple as that.
Edgerton Trowbridge
November 8, 2025 AT 07:17It is imperative to underscore the profound lack of transparency inherent in the Radx AI token. The absence of a publicly accessible development roadmap, verifiable team members, and a functioning blockchain infrastructure renders any investment in this asset fundamentally untenable. The trading volume, while nominally present, fails to meet the threshold of market viability required for sustainable liquidity. One must exercise extreme caution when confronted with speculative instruments lacking empirical underpinnings.
Matthew Affrunti
November 8, 2025 AT 16:32Man, this is such a good rundown. I’ve seen so many people falling for these ‘AI’ tokens thinking they’re the next big thing. Honestly, if it doesn’t have a GitHub and a Discord with more than 5 active members, it’s not worth your time. Stick to the ones actually building something.
mark Hayes
November 9, 2025 AT 22:55Low volume + no devs + no updates = ghost token 🚩💀 I’ve been burned before by these. One day the price is up, next day the whole thing vanishes. I just don’t get how people still fall for this. At least warn people before they send money into the void.
Derek Hardman
November 10, 2025 AT 08:11An excellent and meticulously researched analysis. The distinction drawn between Radx AI and legitimate AI-driven blockchain projects is both clear and compelling. The absence of verifiable technical documentation, coupled with negligible trading volume and an absence of community engagement, constitutes a textbook case of speculative tokenism. Investors would be well advised to redirect capital toward projects demonstrating demonstrable utility and operational transparency.
Eliane Karp Toledo
November 10, 2025 AT 18:48Everyone’s acting like this is just a dumb coin. But what if it’s a test? What if Radx AI is a decoy? They’re using it to distract regulators while the real AI blockchain is being built in the background. The ‘no code’? That’s because it’s all in zero-knowledge proofs. The ‘no team’? They’re all undercover NSA agents. The low volume? That’s because the real buyers are using private channels. This isn’t a scam - it’s a counterintelligence operation. You think you’re smart for avoiding it? You’re exactly who they want to ignore.
Phyllis Nordquist
November 11, 2025 AT 05:11Thank you for this comprehensive and rigorously sourced evaluation. The comparative analysis with established AI blockchain projects such as Fetch.ai and SingularityNET is particularly illuminating. The absence of verifiable development activity, coupled with the critically low liquidity metrics, renders Radx AI a non-viable investment vehicle. Such tokens represent not merely speculative risk, but a systemic failure of due diligence in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. I would encourage all readers to prioritize projects with demonstrable, auditable progress.
Eric Redman
November 11, 2025 AT 18:59Bro this is the most boring post I’ve ever read. Like… Radx AI? Who cares? It’s just another meme coin with a fancy name. I bought it for fun at $0.02 and now I’m up 150%. If you’re not gambling, you’re not living. Just saying.
Brett Benton
November 13, 2025 AT 16:18As someone who’s lived in three countries and watched crypto cycles roll through, I’ve seen this movie before. The names change - but the pattern? Always the same. Hype → fake utility → pump → dump → silence. Radx AI? Classic. Don’t be mad when your wallet’s empty. Look at the real builders. They don’t need to scream. They just ship.
David Roberts
November 14, 2025 AT 03:33While the empirical data presented is statistically compelling, one must interrogate the epistemological foundations of the critique. If one accepts that blockchain is inherently a trustless system, then the absence of a whitepaper may not signify absence of substance, but rather a deliberate ontological rejection of centralized narrative control. The low volume? Perhaps indicative of a pre-launch stealth phase, wherein the protocol is being stress-tested in decentralized shadow markets. The RSI? A red herring - market sentiment is no longer quantifiable via traditional indicators in a post-CEX world. This is not a failure - it is a paradigm shift, and you are merely observing its silhouette.
Monty Tran
November 15, 2025 AT 00:35You people are so naive. Radx AI is being taken over by AI bots from the future. That’s why there’s no code. That’s why there’s no team. That’s why the price is stuck. They’re waiting for the right moment to launch the real version - the one that runs on quantum AI. You think you’re smart for avoiding it? You’re just part of the timeline they’re trying to erase.
Beth Devine
November 16, 2025 AT 03:21I really appreciate how clear and calm this breakdown is. It’s easy to get caught up in the noise, but when someone takes the time to lay out the facts without drama, it makes all the difference. Thank you for helping people avoid a bad mistake.